Holocaust
Studies: A Journal of Culture and History
Abstracts of
articles in Issue 13.2/3
- Konrad Kwiet, ‘I boxed my way through life’:
The Incredible Story of Bully Salem Schott
- This article narrates the incredible story of
Bully and Gerda Schott. Bully was one of few Jews to escape Auschwitz,
which he did with the help
of his future wife Gerda. After escape Bully and Gerda survived
the rest of the war, independently of one another, in Berlin. After the
war Bully
co-operated with the Soviet forces in the tracking down of ex-Nazis.
In 1950 he emigrated to Australia. It is individual narratives like these
that demonstrate that, despite geographical distance, the Holocaust
became
part of the history of Australia too. Gerda and Bully became Australian
citizens in 1959.
- Suzanne Rutland, In the Shadow of the Holocaust:
The Development of Moriah College, Sydney
- This paper analyses the legacy of the Holocaust
in the development of Moriah College, today the largest Jewish school
in Australia, and explains
why this tragedy led to a determined effort to achieve Jewish renewal
as well as academic success. The growth of the College was facilitated
first
by restitution and later by the generosity of survivors. As a result
of survivors’ reluctance to talk about their experiences, there
was no formal study of the Holocaust until the late 1970s when Holocaust
education
and memorialisation became part of the College’s programme. An analysis
of this adds to our understanding of the ‘silence’, an issue
of significant debate in recent scholarship.
- David Ritter, Distant Reverberations: Australian
Responses to the Trial of Adolf Eichmann
- The trial of Adolf Eichmann in Jerusalem in 1961
is widely regarded as one of the principal events in the rise
to prominence of a distinct
event known as ‘the Holocaust’ in Western European and American
cultural consciousness. This article considers the impact of the
Eichmann trial in Australia.
- John Docker,
An Early Holocaust Novel:Patrick White’s
Riders in the Chariot, a Critique
- Patrick White’s novel Riders in the Chariot
(1961) can be regarded as a contribution to Holocaust literature, broadly
defined. The novel features
as one of its main characters Mordecai Himmelfarb, a Holocaust
survivor, who makes his way from Germany, via Palestine, to Australia.
In a comparison
with Joyce’s Ulysses, with its anti-essentialising construction of
the complex consciousness of Bloom, Riders in the Chariot is revealed
to be essentialising in its notions of Jewishness. It assimilates Jewish
identity
to a romantic discourse of attachment to land, highly problematic
in a continent where the Indigenous people have been largely dispossessed
of
that land. The essay also discusses the novel’s interest in Kabbalah.
Overall, the essay convicts the novel of aesthetic crudity, which
has troubling implications for how it perceives its characters,
including Jewish characters.
- Sharon Kangisser
Cohen, ‘Remembering
for us’: The Transgenerational Transmission of Holocaust Memory and
Commemoration
- Commemoration has moved from the periphery to
the centre of Australian Jewish consciousness, a trend that
is also discernable amongst Jewish communities.
Over the past six decades the voice of the Holocaust survivor
has become increasingly audible, and has been instrumental in
establishing a public
memory of the Holocaust in Australia. Today, survivors are at
the forefront of the commemorative activities and their individual
stories, representing
a myriad of different experiences, are central to Holocaust education.
At present the issue that confronts the Sydney Jewish community
is no different from the questions facing other communities.
How is memory of the Holocaust
to be kept alive and vibrant as survivors’ voices begin to recede
and as the past passes from ‘living memory to history’? This
article is based on group interviews conducted with Holocaust
survivors living in Sydney, Australia and explores how these Holocaust
survivors
would like the Holocaust to be remembered in the future. From
the discussion groups it was clear that most of these survivors
are unsure if the next
generation possesses the inclination and ability not only to remember
the Holocaust, but to remember it well. There was a clear sentiment
amongst all the groups that one of the only ways the memory of the Holocaust
can
survive is by being cast as a religious act, duty and obligation,
to be codified in the Jewish religious calendar.
- Amelia Klein, Memory-Work: Video Testimony,
Holocaust Remembrance and the Third Generation
- This article investigates the responses of grandchildren
of Holocaust survivors to Holocaust video testimonies archived
at the Jewish Holocaust
Museum and Research Centre, Melbourne, Australia. Interviews with
the grandchildren show that many have begun to question the
existing communal obligations
surrounding Holocaust remembrance. As significant sources for
Holocaust remembrance, video testimonies have important roles
to play in facilitating ‘memory-work’ for
the third generation. Watching video testimony allows viewers
to move beyond existing formulaic approaches towards Holocaust
remembrance and form their
own personal responses. The voices of the third generation emphasise
that Holocaust memory in Australia will be shaped by each generation
in ways
that are meaningful for them.
- Avril Alba, Displaying the Sacred: Australian
Holocaust Memorials in Public Life
- Focusing on the Sydney Jewish Museum’s
(SJM) Sanctum of Remembrance, this article explores the relationship
between
Holocaust memorials, the Jewish commemorative tradition and the
sacralisation of Holocaust memory in the Australian context.
I argue that the building, design and function of the Sanctum
reflects a deeply felt need within the Australian Jewish survivor
community to develop alternative commemorative forms as a response
to perceived ‘inadequate’ theology. Subsequently,
the sacred Holocaust memory housed in this space departs significantly
from traditional Jewish responses to destruction. Further, the
public nature of the Sanctum has the dual effect of transforming
the Jewish commemorative tradition and conveying that tradition
to a largely non-Jewish public, explicitly linking Jewish tragedy
to broader public concerns. In this progression, a sacred Holocaust
memory is created that is at once particular and universal, providing
Australian Holocaust memorials with unprecedented opportunities
for empathy and identification with other victims of genocide.
Yet this powerful dialectic remains, at present, under-utilised.
Whether the SJM and other Australian Holocaust museums choose
to engage in these opportunities will ultimately depend on the
ability of these institutions to grapple with the complexity
of Australia’s colonial past and contemporary multicultural
society. To contend with these issues requires the ability to
understand and ‘display’ the nation as perpetrator
and resistor of genocidal acts, a complex narrative difficult
to assimilate into largely ‘static’ museum and memorial
space. To not do so, however, risks rendering Holocaust memory
in Australian museums a solely ‘internal’, Jewish
concern.